Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Happy's avatar

Usually "falsehood" is reserved for something intentional or malicious, not a printing error. In this case, I don't really understand the intolerance, it's not like this mistake makes a big difference. If anything the corrected printing makes a better case to celebrate Lag B'Omer! I think the intolerance in this case is similar to Shadal's selective intolerance of ungrammatical kabbalistic prayers, and stems from the Maskilim's intolerance of anything connected to kabbalah or the irrational.

Expand full comment
Nahum's avatar

Haven't looked into this all that much but I believe this (mis)conception long predates 1802 (will update if have time to research) and isn't necessarily based on this alleged printing error.

Zohar describes the day that Rashbi died as one full of joy, even referring to it as a הילולא-celebration, a term typically reserved for weddings.

That being the case perhaps the connection was easily made between Rashbi's unidentified day of joy with the day of his death.

Perhaps the alleged printing error was an outgrowth of this not unreasonable assumption.

Although see here https://www.yeshiva.org.il/wiki/index.php/%D7%9C%22%D7%92_%D7%91%D7%A2%D7%95%D7%9E%D7%A8 where Chida made this point already: אמנם, החיד"א כתב כי ככל הנראה מדובר בטעות סופר והוכיח זאת מכך שלמרות שרבי חיים ויטאל תלמיד האר"י כתב רבות על יום ל"ג בעומר כיום שמחתו של רשב"י שלמד באותו היום מרבי עקיבא, עדיין לא הזכיר את דברי רבו על כך שיום זה הוא יום פטירתו של רשב"י.

Apparently the day R Akiva taught Rashbi was also a joyous day so not so sure about my theory anymore . .

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts