Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Yaakov's avatar

Very interesting questions. Rav Avraham Ben Harambam seems so bothered by the pshat that he interprets it as (1) not yaakov’s family - only affiliates and (2) it wasn’t real avoda zarah - rather jewlery with idolatrous images and (3) ויטמן means destruction , so the whole thing ends up being lifnim mishurat hadin.

Some additional questions/observations:

1, The midrash interprets yehoshua 24:26 as a continuation of this story, when he brings the people through a brit to not turn to avodah zara, and warns them that they won’t be able to handle avodat hashem so easily (e.g. 24:19). The story also explicitly connects to yaakov’s purchase of the field (24:32) https://mg.alhatorah.org/Full/Yehoshua/24.26#e0n6

2. Was this known tree (note the ה"א הידיעה) an Asherah? We know that this type of tree served as an asherah (Hoshea 4:13, Yechezkel 6:13, Yeshaya 1:29 etc) and even the name of the tree is the feminine form of ‘god” (אלה ) . (I think that the footnotes on rav avrham ben harambam quote someone to that effect?)

3. Building on the previous point, Is this tied to kingship/leadership which is of direct interest in the parsha? Leaders are often analogized to trees in tanach (e.g. Yechezkel 31, Shoftim 9), and chazal specifically tie corrupt leadership to an ashera (sanhedrin 7b explaining Devarim 16:21)

4. In terms of the different presentation to his family (Question 3), my first thought is that it sounds like a translation from yaakov’s perception of the good (Hashem’s revelation per se) to the common notion of good that his followers/students have (saving from trouble) (akin to a difference between oved miahava vs miyirah, or applying devarim gedolim to their devarim ketanim appliaction)

Expand full comment
YybTurner's avatar

I saw most of your questions asked by the Alshich.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts